Latest News from TREE

Urge Gov. Haslam to Veto the IEP Voucher Bill

On Wednesday, the Tennessee House approved HB 138/SB 27 by a slim, three-vote margin. This IEP Voucher Bill puts our most vulnerable children at risk and lacks any mechanism to ensure academic achievement or the safety of the children who are eligible to access it. We would like to thank the following state representatives who recognized that this bill is bad policy and voted against it:

Akabari, Alexander, Armstrong, Beck, Byrd, Cafee, Camper, Carr, Clemmons, Coley, Cooper, Doss, Dunlap, Eldridge, Farmer, Favors, Fitzhugh, Forgety, Gilmore, Halford, Hardaway, M. Hill, Hulsey, Jones, Keisling, Love, McDaniel, Miller, Mitchell, Parkinson, Pitts, Powell, Ramsey, Sanderson, Shaw, Shepard, Stewart, Swann, Towns, Travis, Turner, and Windle.

Now is the time to contact Governor Haslam and ask him to veto this bill, which sets the stage for potential abuse, fraud, and neglect of our most vulnerable children.


Stop the IEP Voucher Bill

House Bill 138 passed out of Finance yesterday in a late evening session. It will be voted on by the full House as early as this Wednesday morning. Again, we need your help to defeat this legislation NOW.

This bill now targets some of our most vulnerable special education populations: autism, deaf-blindness, hearing impairments, intellectual disability (low IQ), orthopedic impairments, traumatic brain injury, and visual impairments.

The parent that accepts this voucher will be awarded state BEP money–minus the 4% that is held back by the state for administrative purposes–leaving them with around $6,000. The money will be allocated quarterly as reimbursement for education-related expenses. Parents accepting the voucher must waive their child’s rights to a free and appropriate education in the least restrictive environment. They will also be forced to give up any services and therapies provided for their child in public school.

Schools accepting this money are not required to provide an IEP, nor are they required to have therapists or educators trained in special education. Parents will have to seek independent therapy services, which cost about $100/hr, and an education environment (e.g., private school, tutoring, homeschool). Because $6600 is not sufficient to cover the costs of educating a child with these needs, parents must prioritize their spending and, unless they can supplement with their own money, their children will very likely not receive necessary services/therapies. In addition, rural parents may have to drive long distances to find qualified special education teachers and therapists.

HB 138 puts our most vulnerable children, who lack the ability to self advocate, in isolated settings and puts the burden on the parent to not only find expert help, but also advocate for their education without any laws or regulations supporting them. The state estimates that only 1-2% of eligible students will use these vouchers. We do not need a law that creates a program for 180-360 children that requires a dedicated TDOE staff to manage it. This bill is not about opportunities for children with disabilities–it is simply an opportunity for outside interests to sneak a voucher plan in TN.

Take a minute and contact the House members  as soon as possible this morning to tell them you are against putting our most vulnerable students at risk and ask them to vote NO on HB 138.  Thank you for your voices. You make a difference.


Your difference stopped HB 1049 – the main voucher bill. They did not have the votes in finance sub committee and it was put on notice for 2016.




4/13/2015 Update on Education Bills in the Legislature

This year’s legislative session is drawing to a close over the next couple weeks, and we can’t thank you enough for speaking out against vouchers. We know we’ve asked you to contact legislators several times but it’s so important that our lawmakers hear voices other than the big money organizations that attempt to pit elected officials against our schools.

A Couple Questions We Hear

Why do we hear almost exclusively about what’s happening in the House instead of the Senate?
The Senate, quite frankly, is a lost cause in many cases. The composition of the Senate is such that bad education legislation rarely gets robust debate let alone a competitive vote. Vouchers, for example, passed the Senate Education Committee 8-0, the Senate Finance Committee 9-2, and the full Senate 23-9. It racked up similar tallies last year. As a result, we choose to focus primarily on the House.

Why are we asked to contact legislators so many times about the same bill?
Not only do bills often go through several committees and subcommittees, but votes can be delayed several times for any reason. As a result, we make multiple asks both because different requests go to a different group of legislators and because we want to keep the issue fresh on legislators’ minds.

Here’s where various pieces of harmful legislation stand:

Vouchers (HB 1049)
This bill creates a statewide school voucher program that the legislature estimates will cost local schools $70 million per year. In the House, the bill passed the reform-friendly Education Administration Committee. It later went through Government Operations Committee (which does not have the power to kill a bill), who amended the bill to delay its effective date. It next goes to the Finance Subcommittee (a/k/a Budget Subcommittee) on April 14. The Senate passed this bill, slightly amended, on March 30. (It also passed vouchers last year.)

IEP Supervouchers (HB 138)
This bill creates a supervoucher program for all 120,000 students who have a special education IEP – an individualized education plan. (Some children receive IEPs for relatively simple – and easily correctable – issues, such as incorrectly producing the /r/ sound.) These supervouchers allow parents to pull the education dollars intended for their child’s education and put it toward any unaccredited, unproven, and unaccountable use that can be argued is educating or treating the child. In the House, the bill sneaked through the reform-friendly Education Programming Committee 7-6. It was heard in Government Operations Committee on April 7 but a vote was delayed until April 14. The Senate Finance Committee is scheduled to hear this bill as well.

ASD Expansion (HB 473)
This bill allows ASD charter schools to recruit high-achieving students from high-quality public schools to help make ASD schools not look like a failure. In the House, the bill will be heard in Finance Committee on April 14. It is awaiting a floor vote in the Senate.

For-Profit Charter Schools (HB 781)
This bill allows charter schools to be run by for-profit corporations. In the House, the bill was delayed until 2016 in the Education Programming Committee. The bill made it to the floor in the Senate but will not be voted on this year.

Parent Trigger (HB 651)
This bill makes it easier for a group of parents to have their school converted into a charter school. In the House, the bill was pulled from consideration for this year. In the Senate, the bill is awaiting a Finance Committee vote.

Here’s where various pieces of helpful legislation stand:

Second Chance for Priority Schools (HB 921)
This bill prohibits the ASD from taking over a school if a priority list school not yet marked for ASD takeover either a) quantifiably improves its test scores and assigns a new principal or b) converts the school to a community school. Sponsored in the House by Rep. Raumesh Akbari and in the Senate by Sen. Reginald Tate (co-sponsored by Sen. Steve Dickerson), this legislation passed the Senate unanimously and is scheduled for a vote in the House Finance Committee on April 14.

Ban on Mandated Standardized Tests for K-2 (HB 983)
This bill bans state or locally mandated standardized testing on students in kindergarten through second grade. Sponsored in the House by Rep. Matthew Hill (co-sponsored by Rep. Bo Mitchell) and in the Senate by Sen. Frank Niceley, this legislation did not come up for a vote.

ASD Abolition (HB 508)
This bill eliminates the achievement school district (ASD) at the end of the 2015-16 school year. Sponsored in the House by Rep. Bo Mitchell and in the Senate by Sen. Thelma Harper, this legislation did not come up for a vote.

Banning ASD Mission Creep (HB 856)
The bill prohibits an ASD school from expanding to additional grades (e.g., converting from a high school to a middle and high school) and prohibits the ASD from recruiting students from other zones. Sponsored in the House by Rep. Bill Beck and in the Senate by Sen. Thelma Harper, this legislation was killed by the House Education Administration Committee.

Regulating ASD Takeovers (HB 920)
This bill prohibits new ASD schools from taking over a single grade at a time, causing conflict by having two schools in the same building. Sponsored in the House by Rep. Raumesh Akbari and in the Senate by Sen. Reginald Tate, this legislation did not come up for a vote.

The legislature is expected to shut down for the year after a couple fast and furious weeks of bill shuffling. We’ll keep you posted and continue to ask for your support of our schools!

Photo credit: getty images

Voucher Sharks Are Circling

On Tuesday, the House Education Instruction & Programs committee will consider an additional voucher bill that is broader in scope and more devoid of accountability than any voucher proposal Tennessee has seen before.

Photo credit: getty images

30 Seconds of your time can say NO to this legislation.

House Bill 138 has NO limit on number of vouchers available. NO requirements at all for participating education providers, and NO testing or reporting requirements. An eligible student under this bill is any Tennessee child with an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) providing for special education services. Currently, 120,000 students in Tennessee meet that standard. Make no mistake, this vision – over a hundred thousand available vouchers with no meaningful standards or oversight – is not an outlier. It’s the ultimate goal of voucher advocates, and it’s where they hope any voucher law will ultimately take Tennessee.

This bill states that a parent of any child with an IEP, in exchange for a promise to not enroll the child in public school, may have BEP funds deposited into a bank account the parent controls. The parent is to use the funds to educate the child in some fashion, whether by enrolling in private school, purchasing an online learning program, hiring a tutor, or some other means. This bill specifically states that there will be NO regulations or standards applied to a participating educational provider. Private schools accepting this voucher are not required to be accredited or have any operating history. A provider need not actually provide the services called for in the child’s IEP. The bill calls for NO testing or reporting of educational results. ZERO accountability. And this lack of accountability runs counter to all of the laws that have been passed in recent years requiring testing and accountability for our public schools. Why would our legislators allow our tax money to be spent without any accountability, after spending years trying to establish accountability in our schools?

It’s staggering to think of the abuse, waste, and inadequate education that this bill would produce if it becomes law. The proposal is modeled after a similar law in Florida, which has produced rampant fraud and educational malpractice. It’s like a perverse science experiment, using disabled school kids as lab rats and funded by nine figures in taxpayer cash: Dole out millions to anybody calling himself an educator. Don’t regulate curriculum or even visit campuses to see where the money is going.”  [*Disclaimer – this article contains graphic and offensive language and behavior used by the private schools that received taxpayer funds under Florida’s program.]

We need your help TODAY to speak up against this outrageous proposal. Take 30 seconds and CLICK HERE to tell legislators NOT to turn their backs on our students with special needs, and to say NO to opening the door to fraud and misuse of Tennessee education dollars on a monumental scale.

Art Credit: 123rf stock image

Speak Up for Adequate School Funding

Art Credit: 123rf stock image

Art Credit: 123rf stock image

Kudos to the local Tennessee boards of education who have finally stepped up to DEMAND that the state make good on its obligation to adequately fund our public schools. Shelby, Knox, and Hamilton counties have all “taken steps toward suing the state over the adequacy of education funding in Tennessee.” If you live in one of these counties, please thank your school board members. If you live in another county, please encourage your school board representative to join in this action.

The next system to consider action is Metro Nashville Public Schools. Amazingly, some in MNPS appear to be resistant to joining a statewide effort to get our students and teachers the resources they need to succeed. On Tuesday, the MNPS board will discuss whether to take action.

If you live in Nashville, it is crucial that you contact the school board NOW to urge them to stand up for our students.

Here’s your handy copy and paste list to email the board and Dr. Register:

The shameful truth is Tennessee consistently ranks 48th or 49th in the nation for school funding. In 2007, our state government created the BEP 2.0, a formula that determines the level of funding the state should provide to school districts. In the seven years BEP 2.0 has been in place, the state has NOT fully funded the BEP 2.0–willfully shirking its responsibility to adequately support our schools. This is an injustice to children across the state and it’s time for Metro Nashville school board representatives to join with their colleagues in Tennessee and fight for the students they were elected to represent.  It’s time we all stand up and demand that our state adequately fund our schools.

Speak up today. Email the school board.

Read about backstory:

TnEdReport Archives on Basic Education Plan Funding Formula

The BEP is the Basic Education Plan which is the state funding formula for public schools. The formula includes a number of components, including funding for teaching and staff positions based on district size as well as allocations for teacher salaries and insurance. It is the mechanism by which the state fulfills its constitutional responsibility to provide a free public education to all Tennessee students.

In collaboration with East Nashville United.